|
|
THE REALITY OF OUR MENTALITY
Have you ever looked at the shape that Black America is in today and tried to understand why we are still in the struggle, even though we have all the strength we need? What is stopping us from realizing the power we have? It�s not just money; we have over Four Billion dollars in disposable income that we spend annually, yet nothing has really changed.
I was attending a meeting where the speaker was talking about the Stockholm Syndrome. As he spoke, it suddenly struck me: how does this psychological phenomenon apply to me, to us as African Americans? The more I thought about it, the more I realized that perhaps some closer attention to this interesting piece of information because it may indeed be at least one of the major keys to our recovery and change as a people. The Stockholm Syndrome is a term given a phenomenon in human behavior, which, as it turns out, has been documented since Biblical times, when
In the summer of 1973, four hostages were taken in a botched bank robbery at Kreditbanken in
� A person threatens to kill another and is perceived as having the capability to do so.
� The other cannot escape, so her or his life depends on the threatening person.
� The threatened person is isolated from outsiders so that the only other perspective available to her or him is that of the threatening person.
� The threatening person is perceived as showing some degree of kindness to the one being threatened.[1]
It takes only 3-4 days for the characteristic bond of the Stockholm syndrome to emerge when captor and captive are strangers. After that, research shows, the duration of captivity is no longer relevant. A strategy of trying to keep your captor happy in order to stay alive becomes an obsessive identification with the likes and dislikes of the captor which has the result of warping your own psyche in such a way that you come to sympathize with your tormenter. ? �African American women had to endure the threat and the practice of sexual exploitation. There were no safeguards to protect them from being sexually stalked, harassed, or raped, or to be used as long-term concubines by masters and overseers. The abuse was widespread, as the men with authority took advantage of their situation. Even if a woman seemed agreeable to the situation, in reality she had no choice. Slave men, for their part, were often powerless to protect the women they loved.� [2]
I believe that by now you are beginning to see the direction in which I am heading and, even if you don�t, read on. The syndrome explains what happens in hostage-taking situations, but can also be used to understand the behavior of battered spouses, prostitutes, members of religious cults, Holocaust victims, even household pets, and what is significant and relevant to this article, Americans of African descent.
Historical, sociological and governmental archives continue to ignore the parallels between the Jewish Holocaust and the enslavement of Africans in the
Below are some highlights of how this process was and is used to psychologically master the captured persons. This is provided in the historical context of the experience of the enslaved African:
Alertness reduction
Interior of a Slave Ship, a woodcut illustration from the publication, A History of the Amistad Captives, reveals how hundreds of slaves could be held within a slave ship. Tightly packed and confined in an area with just barely enough room to sit up, slaves were known to die from a lack of breathable air. Image Credit:
Programmed Confusion
Step Two is programmed confusion: You are mentally assaulted while your alertness is being reduced as in Step One. This is accomplished with a deluge of new information encounters or one-to-one processing, which usually amounts to the controller bombarding the individual with questions or results. During this phase of decognition, reality and illusion often merge and perverted logic is likely to be accepted. You are on a slave ship and you are made to witness violent acts that are shown as examples of what would happen if you were not compliant. You are degraded, naked, and shamed � and you haven�t even reached your destination yet, where more is to come�
Thought Stopping
Step Three is thought stopping: Techniques are used to cause the mind to go "flat.� These are altered-state-of-consciousness techniques that initially induce calmness by giving the mind something simple to deal with and focusing awareness. The continued use brings on a feeling of elation and eventually hallucination. The result is the reduction of thought and eventually, if used long enough, the cessation of all thought and withdrawal from everyone and everything except that which the controlling captors direct. The takeover is then complete. Upon arrival the head of a slave was shaved, removing the associated ties to tribal culture; you did not know who was a part of your tribal family without any identifiers. Slaves were systematically beaten, or otherwise brutally �trained� to understand that compliance within the boundaries is the only way to escape torture and pain that started when they were on the ships transporting
You where verbally and physically reminded that you were not considered human, therefore had no right to independent thought and that your survival hinged upon your appearing to be placid, kind and doing just what you are told.
When persons being held as slaves were accused by their masters of insubordination, or of eating more than their allotment of food, they might expect to be fitted with an iron muzzle. In his autobiography, Olaudah Equiano described his first encounter with such a device in the mid-1700s: From Africans in America: The Terrible Transformation, Part I Slave with Iron Muzzle is an illustration from the 1839 publication, Souvenirs d'un aveugle, by Jacques Etienne Victor Arago
"I had seen a black woman slave as I came through the house, who was cooking the dinner, and the poor creature was cruelly loaded with various kinds of iron machines; she had one particularly on her head, which locked her mouth so fast that she could scarcely speak, and could not eat or drink. I [was] much astonished and shocked at this contrivance, which I afterwards learned was called the iron muzzle."
The most effective technique in this step used upon Africans � and still prevalent today � is introducing uncertainty about identity. After stripping away all physical forms of identity, the person is attacked verbally and physically. So you can imagine the fear and tension this situation generates. Most coped with the stress by mentally going away. They literally go into an alpha state, which automatically makes them many times as suggestible as they normally are. And another loop of the downward spiral into conversion is successfully effected. Remember the character in Color Purple and her behavior once she was released from prison? ��Slaves were considered property, and they were property because they were black. Their status as property was enforced by violence -- actual or threatened. People, black and white, lived together within these parameters, and their lives together took many forms. Enslaved African Americans could never forget their status as property, no matter how well their owners treated them�The killing of a slave was almost never regarded as murder, and the rape of slave women was treated as a form of trespassing�Some slaves committed suicide or mutilated themselves to ruin their property value��[4]
Slaves Left to Die is a woodcut illustration from the book, The Boy Travellers on the Congo, published in 1888. Accompanying the illustration is a description of why slave owners killed captives while travelling..."Sometimes they left them to die or recover, as best they might, and Dr. Livingstone tells how he saw groups of dying people with slave yokes around their necks, near the road where he travelled. Some of the slave-traders were tender-hearted enough not to take life wantonly, but this was not always the case. Those who looked upon the dreadful traffic purely in the light of business made it a rule to kill every slave who could not keep up with the caravan. They did so not from any special delight in the killing, but because it spurred the survivors on to endure the hardships of the march, and never to yield as long as there was power to drag one foot before the other.� From Africans in
Vicious language is also frequently used, purposely, to make captive uncomfortable or fearful. Yet another; there is no humor in the communications...at least until the participants are remade. Then, merry-making and humor are highly desirable as symbols of the new joy the participants have supposedly "found." Consider the "Happy Negro� image that most Anglos are more comfortable with, even today. We are considered potentially threatening when not socially �shufflin� and grinnin�. I never understood why -- until I researched this article -- it bothered me when a spectator standing near me during one of the first major golf tournaments Tiger Woods participated in, yelled in such an ominous tone �smile, Tiger�, as he walked by on his way to the next hole. In his voice there were echoes of the ghosts of all of the old massahs, who expected a slave to grin and dance on cue, in order to avoid the lash of a whip.
Since it has been documented that this process only takes three to four days to emerge as the new psyche of an individual, imagine what irreparable psychological scars were created over generations of slavery in this country. Even though there was Irish slavery in this country, they knew that their experience had a specific ending that they could look toward; Africans did not. Even after their physical emancipation, there was no psychological deprogramming, no debriefing for freed African slaves. Former slaves were left stunned and shocked, to find their own way financially and physically, all the while not understanding that they were far from psychological freedom. There were, instead, new, more sinister forms of slavery generated -- then�and now.
Today, there are so many ways in which we are exposed to, indentured and/or enslaved -- socially, economically, and mentally � that they would be too numerous to identify and detail in one article. I am going to provide a few examples and challenge you to begin to identify others in your own life:
1. Labels. We are a unique group people who allow ourselves to be defined by the labels on our clothes, shoes, purses, cars, etc. We are a unique group of people that spend over Four Billion dollars annually and have little to show for it. We think in the short term, fearing the day when it�s all taken away from us. �If African Americans study their history, they will become more aware of how labels have been used to dehumanize them. It is time for them to collectively become critically conscious of the slave mentality they exercise within their culture. They did not come to this country as �niggers.� They must break this bondage, free themselves, and stand up against evil.� [6]We are enslaved to defining ourselves and each other by the makeup and the model, fearing that who we are as individuals may not measure up. Sameness is more important; staying within the boundaries set for us is much safer. We allow others to define what success looks like for us, from the clothes we wear to the art we purchase. And who profits?
2. Drugs and all that is drug-related. Drugs are believed to have been introduced into this country as a method of control of the African American communities (See http://www.friendsoffreedom.com/Writings/DupeOfDrugWar.html). Those who have not become a slave to the drug itself are slaves to the perception of drug sales being the solution to their exit from their plantation of poverty. However, this is pure myth, given that the majority of inmates � 58.6% -- in prison are there on drug-related charges, most of them African American, most with harsher sentencing than their Anglo counterparts. �If the ghetto drug dealers are the young capitalists who could, under better circumstances, become community leaders, the influx of cheap cocaine and the increasing poverty makes these possible ghetto leaders emerge faster as outlaws, the result being that they are eliminated. What better way to undermine your enemies? What better way to fund covert actions? And what better way to grandstand about crime, morality, and values? �[7] Then there are the drug-related homicides, drive-by shootings that generate thought-stopping fear within a neighborhood. Ninety-one percent of those imprisoned for drugs are hooked again and back in the system within a year. And who profits?
Recidivism is the return of a person to prison after being released on parole or by serving the full term of his or sentence. Prisons and the business of incarceration are booming. As a result there is an increase in the business of privatization of prisons, so that they are run outside of the government. Prisons offer a low cost employment base for corporate contracting for anything from farming to inbound call centers. The inmates are paid a practically nothing, while the prison owners reap the primary profits. In addition, laws have been in the works, which would require prisoners to repay the cost of their incarceration. So upon release,
a prisoner not only has to battle the task of finding a job that he or she is unlikely to be skilled to attain, there is the stigma of hiring an ex-convict and possibly a bill to repay to the government. An ex-convict is likely to be dumped right back onto the �plantation� from which he was removed, which in itself increases the likelihood of his or her return to prison (see below). The definition of a slave is a person who has no control of him or herself and is completely dominated by something or someone; a property of that which dominates. And who profits?
3. Gentrification, in basic terms, is how the city government allows your neighborhoods and their properties to become devalued by neighborhood crime, lack of upkeep, and lack of support for aging homeowners who purchased the homes during the �white flight� to the suburbs. This justifies the destruction of broken down public housing, formerly a tool for containing the minority poor in one area, which is torn down and replaced by condos, restaurants and townhomes that welcome the travel-weary suburb dweller back into the city. The minority poor is displaced, some lured into believing that the suburbs is the best place to go, not realizing what it will ultimately cost them financially or through isolation. Across the country, in every major city, business professionals and their families are quietly purchasing Uncle John or Auntie Nina�s old house for a fraction of its worth, fixing it up with low interest loans the city offers from their city revitalization funds and moving back into the city. Your neighbors, meanwhile, are being lured into believing that moving out into the suburbs will somehow offer you a better life, because that was the truth � fifteen years ago, when it was not an option. African Americans are often the target victims of housing fraud, including �flipping�, renovation loans, etc. And who profits?
4. Intracultural Separatism. During slavery this was a strength that allowed the slaves to survive emotionally. �Enslaved African Americans also resisted by forming community within the plantation setting. This was a tremendous undertaking for people whose lives were ruled by domination and forced labor. Slaves married, had children, and worked hard to keep their families together. In their quarters they were able to let down the masks they had to wear for whites. There, black men, women, and children developed an underground culture through which they affirmed their humanity. They gathered in the evenings to tell stories, sing, and make secret plans. House servants would come down from the "big house" and give news of the master and mistress, or keep people laughing with their imitations of the whites. It was in their quarters that many enslaved people developed and passed down skills which allowed them to supplement their poor diet and inadequate medical care with hunting, fishing, gathering wild food, and herbal medicines. There, the adults taught their children how to hide their feelings to escape punishment and to be skeptical of anything a white person said. �[8] Today, that strength has become a weakness. We have allowed ourselves to believe that using our culture to segregate ourselves in an ever-shrinking global community is of benefit. Further, what we pass on and among ourselves is what is dictated to us as our labels. Note, for example how in the entertainment industry, when dollars are waved in front of us, we are again the puppets of the masters; we embrace the given perception that we are a group of violent, oversexed people (see music videos). Women are willing to bump and grind in front of the cameras � doing what most would never consider doing if the stage were instead a topless bar. Then there are the comedic roles, the only place where we are allowed to be the majority of primary characters, where we again fall into the stereotypical traps that have been defined for us. Some of us believe that we should embrace our cultural differences by showing that we are �down with the people� but are we really down with the people � ourselves � or with the labels that are provided and we have chosen to embrace? I remember vividly an experience when I passed a group of men on the street and one of them spoke and I responded. He became enraged, because my response wasn�t �black enough� for him. But who made the rule that correct English is �speaking white�? I really don�t believe that it was us. Why? Because I have found that those I deal with in corporations and organizations, who feel compelled to tell me that I am so �articulate,� (their code for �speaking white�) as though it was a rarity among people of color, and at the same time view me as an enemy that had somehow infiltrated the ranks. I believe we should embrace that within our culture which truly defines us as a race, and learn to discern between what is cultural and what is the stereotype by which others wish to define us. One more thing, when it comes to what is cultural and what is stereotypical: what�s in a name? A lot. We have chosen to make up names � especially for our daughters � in the name of culturalism. What we have done is create a new stereotype, with which our children are defined. As one gentleman from
5. Intraracism. The enemy lies within and the enemy is us. In the days of conscious physical slavery in this country, there were the house slaves and the field slaves � a deliberate psychological class distinction. House slaves were programmed to believe that their loyalty included the betrayal of any exhibiting the potential of having an original thought or might potentially create a �problem�. Ask yourself why � even today � Anglos get nervous, even angry when three or more of their minority counterparts are talking together and they don�t know what they are talking about. They want to know what�s going on. If you are asked about the conversation and don�t disclose the subject matter, they become offended. You become the enemy. We are selfish about our piece of the corporate, social or economic pie, afraid to share because we think that there might not be enough, not realizing that we have the power to bake a whole new pie. So we �shuffle and grin� at the �massah�, and sell our own down the river in fear that we will somehow be reclaimed and sent back to the plantation. We ignore the screams of those who realize they have been caught and turn up the volume on Marvin Gaye�s CD. We allow them to eat our young by allowing them to set the standards for how we are treated, rather than setting the standards for ourselves. We are afraid of losing all that we have gained by reaching back over the wall to help others over. We sit and wait expectantly for �them� to come and solve our problems, not understanding that we must control our own destiny and need not wait for permission to do so. We still wait for the forty acres and a mule. And who profits?
�A paradigm is a system of belief or a way of viewing the world�To become a Free Sovereign Individual and do justice to yourself, you need to find out who you are. Most of us, including many who yearn for freedom, suffer from what might be called �slave mentality.� Our personal philosophy and psychology, in important respects, may be that of a slave rather than that of a free sovereign. To get a better understanding of the sovereign individual paradigm, compare the free-wild horse to the broken-domesticated horse. A horse is born free and wild. Try and ride a free-wild horse and it will do its utmost to throw you off. A free-wild horse doesn't like to be broken - enslaved - ridden by a master. Once the cowboy has broken the free-wild horse, it becomes a broken-domesticated-obedient horse. Now the cowboy is the master of the horse. Once a horse has been broken it timidly accepts being saddled and bridled. The saddle is placed on the horse's back and held in place by a strong strap around the horse's body. Attached to the saddle are stirrups for the rider's feet. The rider's boots may have spurs used to inflict pain on the horse in order to make it run faster. The rider may also use a horsewhip. Around the head of the horse a bridle is strapped. Part of the bridle is a metal bit that passes horizontally through the horse's mouth. The reins are attached to the ends of the bit and are used to steer the horse and make it slow down and stop. Pain can be inflicted on the horse by yanking the reins or pulling on them with a seesaw motion. The above paraphernalia are used to make it easy for a rider to control his or her horse - difficult for the horse to disobey its rider. The horse is the slave of the cowboy. The cowboy rides the horse. The horse works for the cowboy. The cowboy owns the horse. The horse obeys the cowboy. Disobedience may be punished. The horse that fights tooth and hoof to prevent you from putting on bridle and saddle may be sold as horsemeat. Horses are born free and wild. Horses are inherently free. They are naturally free. But they can be broken, domesticated, enslaved�One Afrikaans word for native Africans is "naturel" ("native"); another is "skepsel" ("creature"). The most derogatory is "kaffer" ("infidel"). These words are no longer acceptable. My grandfather was a Senator and Chairman of the "Naturelle-Sake Kommissie" ("Native Affairs Commission"). That is the equivalent of the Chairman of a Congressional Committee that oversees the "Bureau of Indian Affairs.� My grandfather was considered very wise and knew exactly what had to be done about the "Swart Gevaar" ("Black Danger"). My grandmother taught black children the three Rs and religion in her own farm school. Her mission was to "civilize the savages.� One day a black maid licked one of my grandmother's spoons. My grandmother gave the maid a tongue lashing for "contaminating a white spoon" - then gave the spoon to the maid to keep, because it was "no longer fit for white use!� When I was about seventeen I got engaged in a conversation with a black man. Suddenly, as if hit by a sledgehammer, I realized that I was talking to a Human Being! Up to that time I had unconsciously assumed that blacks were "inferior creatures" - kind of sub-human�Steve Biko was the founder of the "Black Consciousness" Movement in South Africa. Biko recognized that the biggest problem was that blacks in their own consciousness regarded themselves as "inferior creatures." The culture we grew up in - the language we used - planted the notion in the minds of whites that they were "superior beings," and in the minds of blacks that they were "inferior creatures.� Practically all whites and blacks were subconsciously enculturated in this manner. Biko recognized this phenomenon and advocated that blacks had to free their consciousness from the "inferior-creature" shackles. Biko became world-famous and was visited by people like Bobby Kennedy. Biko was also the greatest threat to white government in
In the presentation I attended, the Holocaust and the Jews were being used as the significant example, these were specific points also attributed to the syndrome and just as easily associated to African Americans, who � like the Jews -- have historically managed to survive:
� The captive (slave) fears those trying to help more than the captors themselves. We have finally figured out how to stop the captor from hitting us so often, and besides he throws us a crumb every now and then. Why would we want you to come and mess things up?
� To the captive (slave), the captors position becomes justified, and that the captive (slave) has no choices. The captor has gotten you to believe that there is no hope, even when you seem to have escaped. Example (true and recent story): Woman hooked on drugs, upon release from jail, takes her baby son and leaves
Recovery can best be achieved when the captive (slave) is away from the captor. It is a proven fact, yet no one has tested this fact on any significant level. If you take someone permanently out of the environment that has generated the position of slavery to drugs, crime, or gang � he or she has a better chance of beating the enslaved addiction.
So now what? I have no intention of extending an instant solution to such a complex problem, since the Stockholm Syndrome has very individualized effects and one solution definitely does not fit all. Further, we are continually distracted by the newer, more subtle versions of passive racism. But knowledge is power and the resource from which you can choose to draw resolution. What you can do, must do, is think -- really think -- about your life, your self. Are you enslaved psychologically? Do you exhibit the behavior of one who suffers from the Stockholm Syndrome or are you affected by its manifestation in others? Becoming conscious of its existence and how it manifests itself in your life is the first step. The next step is to understand your past and that of your ancestors; you will never know where you are going until you understand where you�ve been. There are now resources that provide more historical fact than fantasy, such as A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America by Ronald Takaki and sources on the Internet, such as Africans in
[1] Excerpted from, Domestic Violence Response Training Curriculum, November 1991, by Jeri Martinez
[2] Africans in
[3] �Muse Time" Paper 15. March/April 1999, The Slave Mentality Uttam Thawrani
[4] Africans in
[5] Why Should I be Called A Nigger? by Clifford R. Gahagan
[6] Why Should I be Called A Nigger? by Clifford R. Gahagan
[7] The Duplicity of the War on Drugs Author unknown.
[8] Africans in
[9] Why Should I be Called A Nigger? by Clifford R. Gahagan
[10] Essay by Frederick Mann, 1993
Images and further notes are available in the complete document upon request.
___________________________________________
IS CHURCH YOUR RELIGION?
A Perspective on Church versus Religion
Church and religion: is there a difference and is the difference an important one? Even more critical is whether it is important to God. Back in 1996, in a quest to figure out where I was spiritually, I went back to the basics, even looked up the true meaning of the word church. What I discovered was that a church is nothing more that a group of people with common spiritual beliefs.
I remembered a painting by Gracia called �Syncretism." In the painting, Gracia makes a huge statement about religion as he visually compares the elements used in Catholic rituals and traditions with those used in Voodoo rituals. When you layer upon that premise, the reality of how simple God and Jesus Christ made it by giving us the ten commandments to obey on a physical level in the OT, took it to a new level by adding the expectation that we should obey both the letter and the spirit of the law, then Jesus threw in an additional commandment for good measure by adding the directive to love others as we love ourselves. That's it. But history has demonstrated that we all seem to get ourselves into spiritual trouble when we begin to interpret, dismiss, embellish, re-interpret, justify, or just plain misuse any power we have over other people and claim that our actions are in the name of God, whether we call Him God, Yahweh, Allah, Christ.
Mankind cannot, it seems, trust that God knew what He was talking about when he provided the simple guidelines on how to best live life. From the moment Eve, then Adam, chose to doubt God and do their own thing, mankind has been consistent throughout the ages in putting its own spin on God's directives. Mankind seems to have a compulsive need to do something physical in order to understand and remember how to worship God. So God gave man the rituals they craved in order to serve Him. But in the New Testament, Christ decided to step up the game and set the expectation of approaching both the physical (the letter) and, more importantly, the spirit of keeping His laws. Christ did away with the rituals of sacrifices by becoming the ultimate sacrifice for all mankind. Perhaps because He saw that mankind had begun to practice religion as an exclusionary ritual and that the religion had become more important than the beliefs. Religion today -- which should be the act of executing the common spiritual beliefs that define a church -- is wrought with rituals, dress codes, special languages and prescribed behaviors, as well as social and political agendas, all designed to create an internal and external perception of exclusiveness and exclusion along with the ultimate, primary agenda of overt and covert power. All of which has absolutely nothing to do with God or what He has in mind. Matthew 15: 5 - 9 But you say, If a man says to his father or his mother, That by which you might have had profit from me is given to God; And honor not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have you made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. You hypocrites! How well did Isaiah prophesy of you when he said, 'These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. A church, where the focus is redirected from God, to the worship of and devotion to its leader or leadership -- and their rules, their sole point of view, their decisions, their mandates -- is a man-made religion.
Not a single religion formed has complete intra-religious agreement on how to execute its beliefs -- no matter the theological view -- from Jewish to Muslim, from Catholic to Christian, Buddhist to Apostolic, Mormon to Scientology, Seventh Day Adventist to The Secret. Thus, there are the Catholics, then the Roman Catholics and Episcopalians, the Jews then the Hassidic Jews, innumerous versions of Christian and non-denominational religions, sects and cultures; even Muslims cannot completely agree upon what defines their beliefs, especially when it comes to the physical actions they associate with those beliefs. According to the Biblical history, there was disagreement as to what defines church and religion even when Christ was in human form. In fact, from the beginning of mankind there was a diverse view of church and religion. Christ first uses the word, "church" in Matthew 16:18 where He says that he will found His church upon a rock and that it would not die: And I say also unto you, that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
The Greek word for "church" used in almost every instance in the Bible is Ekklesia which is defined as, a gathering of citizens called out from their homes into some public place, an assembly; an assembly of the people convened at the public place of the council for the purpose of deliberating. If we can concur that the true definition of church is that it is a group of people with common spiritual beliefs, then the key to the truth comes in the understanding of what religion really is. Religion is the action the behavior, if you will -- based upon those common spiritual beliefs. At least that is what religion should be. That would be the purest definition. Christ was very clear in His definition of true religion. In James 1:27, He said: Pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father is this: to visit the orphans and widows in their trouble and to keep oneself unspotted from the world. But what religion should be and what religion is, becomes very different in its translation by man. Is any one of the vast array of denominations or religions more reflective of Christ's intent than others? It is interesting that most Christians would agree that their goal, charter, mission; and yes, desire, is and should be to become as Christ. To think, act, and react as Christ would in any situation is notable, and to that end, it also begs the question: What did Christ intend the Church to look like? To understand what Christ's intent was, we must first being with the basic foundational element provided to us that is the Bible; the authoritative Word of God. Whether any and all spiritually-based religions choose to acknowledge it or not, their beliefs are founded in the same ancient textural writings. All spiritually based religions including Catholicism, Jewish and Muslim are direct results of re-interpretations of the original core spiritual teachings into concepts made by man. It is the eisegesis [an interpretation, especially of Scripture, that expresses the interpreter's own ideas] of those writings that has resulted in the plethora of religions today. One of the purposes of this writing is to challenge the entrenched thinking of the Christian. Those who rely strictly on their intellectual wisdom will reason outside the realm of faith -- as they often do -- and in doing so, will limit the expansive, awesome power of our God, putting Him in a box -- our box, for we want God to be as we are. And as long as we are challenging the paradigms of religious beliefs, let us ponder the possibility that the prospect of power is an underlying component and motivator of our religions.
Is God's Law Legalism?
The word legalism is often tossed about by those who use the term to justify what one wants to do -- or not do -- morally. What makes us want to minimize or denigrate the simplest of truths and laws, in order to claim it as our own idea? The key to the agenda behind the use of this term is the repackaging of God's word in a way that allows justification of man's choices. Those choices are important to secure power and popularity. Some even go so far as to insert the concept that when Christ died, there was no need to obey laws at all because any breaking of the law is automatically forgiven, thus any attempt to promote God's laws within a given church is distained as legalism. Christ was crystal clear about his purpose and about his laws. In John 14:15, Christ spoke just before his crucifixion and said: If you love me, keep My commandments. To make sure he was understood, He repeated it again in verse 21: He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me, and he who loves Me will be love by My Father and I will love him and manifest Myself to him. There is no way to refute this directive, yet there are those who proclaim themselves to be Christian without the understanding that commitment to His word and law is the requirement. He did not say keep some of His commandments, yet the top three commandments we most commonly ignore, minimize, or justify, concern wanting what other have, the Sabbath and sex. Christ said that if you break one of his commandments, you break all of them. His sacrificial death did not negate the requirement to keep God's law. Then there is the other extreme, where physical rituals are incorporated into the belief set of a given church -- perhaps as a physical act of commitment to the spiritual beliefs, which often degenerate into demonstrations of exclusivity or become more important than the beliefs themselves. Paul pinpointed an example of such behavior, when it became evident that a group of people decided that one must be circumcised in order to be saved. This one physical act had nothing to do with obedience to God's law; it instead became one of many religious rituals intended to maintain fraternal order. The truth is, the Spirit of God is not going to lead you into anything that is not Biblical.[1] Thus, the current and popular concept of legalism is not based upon an exegesis [Critical explanation or analysis, especially of a text.] interpretation of the Bible, but upon man's justification of doing what he wants and believing that he can do so without consequence.
Why so many churches?
All of which begs an answer to this question: Why are there so many churches proclaiming themselves to be Christian? Why is there more than one group of Jews, or Muslims, or Catholics? Why is there not just one church one entity that holds those common spiritual beliefs? After all, the Catholic Bible, the Torah, even the Holy Koran/Quran are all connected through their origins of translation. The truth is born in the fruits: money and/or power. Church has become a resource of financial and political gain, a virtual industry of profit especially in the
Wars as the Power of Religion
When points of view about religion collide, wars are born. Religious wars are a direct result of the lust for power. Actions were justified by the belief that the Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, Islamic, Jewish, even atheistic way of doing things is the only way. Is the true goal of any war -- no matter the religious affiliation -- peace or power? Who of us hasn't heard the claim that "religion leads to warfare?" We're familiar with sweeping military campaigns in the Middle East and
At a 2004 conference jointly organized by the World Council of Churches (WCC) and the Bossey Ecumenical Institute, Hindu scholar Dr Ram Puniyani gave a critical analysis of religion, power and violence in the Indian context, and invited the group to be critical of the use and abuse of power in their own contexts. He urged those who espouse a religion to be in solidarity with the poor and oppressed. "The triad of religion, power and violence gets connected once we see the ambitions of those using religion for their narrow goals," he said. "If people of religion cannot be associated with the plight of the poor and oppressed, then they are handmaidens of the powerful and, in turn, become legitimizers of violence." His view was affirmed by A. Rashied Omar, an imam from
The
Lost from the scene was a significant portion of classical Greek science, including Ptolemy's astronomy, Euclid's mathematics, Galen's anatomy, and Aristotle's naturalistic writings. But it hardly could be said that nothing was going on in these Dark Ages, as some are inclined to characterize the next few hundred years. In particular, the establishment of monasteries in the sixth century provided a means for religious training. Literacy improved because instruction depended on readings from the Bible, commentaries, and works of the church Fathers.
Monasteries also provided access to the relatively scant classical works available in Latin. Through the writings of Augustine (354-430), scholars were especially familiar with Plato's Timaeus. This work lent itself to Christian interpretation because it argued that the Universe had a first cause an eternal self-mover that created motion and order. Further, because Plato's god was good, he created a world that was good for us, the creature. Unlike the Christian God, this self-mover was not a personal god; he did not love man, he was not omnipotent, and he was not the object of worship. However, Plato's arguments for a Creator-God, combined with biblically based expectations of seeing God's handiwork in creation (e.g., Psalm 19:1, Romans 1:20), encouraged medieval theologians to affirm the fundamental intelligibility of God's creation. Although Augustine frowned upon the systematic study of nature, the concept of nature's basic orderliness provided an important key to the development of modern science (Jones, 1969, p. 133).
During this same period, Arabic-Islamic science had reached tremendous heights. It led the world in mathematics, physics, optics, astronomy, and medicine. The stability and wealth brought by the spread of Islamic power in the seventh and eighth centuries fostered patronage of higher learning. In 762, al-Mansur established
Crucial to the development of Arabic science was a massive translation program begun by Hunayn ibn Ishaq (808-73), a member of the Nestorian Christian sect. Arabs filled their numerous libraries with tens- or hundreds-of-thousands of books, whereas the Sorbonne in
Some Muslim leaders, like some of their counterparts in early medieval
It was in this very early period of decline that the baton of science began to pass gradually into the hands of the Europeans, especially those who came into contact with the wealth of Islamic knowledge in Spain. Perhaps the next most significant event was the fall of Muslim-held Toledo in 1085. Many important Arabic and classical works from its vast library were translated into Latin. Within a century, these had begun to filter into centers of learning all over Europe. They arrived at a time when scholars such as Anselm (1033-1109) already were reviving the role of reason in faith. Their arrival coincided also with the development of the university as a legal entity with political and intellectual autonomy (Huff, 1993, p. 335). No similar institution appeared in the Arabic world until the twentieth century due, in part, to the orthodox Muslim concept of nature and reason. Religious constraints also played a role in late medieval Europe, but an academic world committed to the biblical views of man's rationality and freedom of choice provided a fertile ground for the rise of modern science. [4]
Muqtedar Khan (a Muslim from India, now living in Michigan) of the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy boldly wrote after 9/11, decrying intolerance in the name of Islam:
The Israeli occupation of Palestine is perhaps central to Muslim grievance against the West. While acknowledging that, I must remind you that Israel treats its one million Arab citizens with greater respect and dignity than most Arab nations treat their citizens. Today, Palestinian refugees can settle and become citizens of the United States but in spite of all the tall rhetoric of the Arab world and Quranic injunctions (24:22) no Muslim country except Jordan extends this support to them. While we loudly and consistently condemn Israel for its ill treatment of Palestinians we are silent when Muslim regimes abuse the rights of Muslims and slaughter thousands of them. Remember Saddam and his use of chemical weapons against Muslims (Kurds)? Remember Pakistani army's excesses against Muslims (Bengalis)? Remember the Mujahideen of Afghanistan and their mutual slaughter? Have we ever condemned them for their excesses? Have we demanded international intervention or retribution against them? Do you know how the Saudis treat their minority Shi'as? Have we protested the violation of their rights? But we all are eager to condemn Israel; not because we care for rights and lives of the Palestinians, we don't. We condemn Israel because we hate "them."
Most wars today, it seems, are civil wars in which one religious group oppresses another. Religion, we tend to believe, purports to bring inner--and outer--peace. It seems contradictory, then, that religion should provide the source for so much conflict. It might be easy for a westerner to blame "those Muslims" or "the Catholics" for the religious intolerance that fuels modern religious warfare. However, the conflicts are far more complex than they may appear on the surface, and the solutions are far less readily apparent than we would like to believe. Since the dawn of European civilization, the Judeo-Christian world seems to have been at war. The Crusades killed countless Christians and Muslims as Europe wrestled for control of the Holy Land. The conflict continued as Turks made inroads into Europe, and when that tide was finally stemmed, Christians warred against Christians as the Reformation threatened Catholicism. When Israel was finally made a state, of course, that began a series of wars and battles that began almost from the first day of Israel's existence. Islam and Hinduism battled over India and Bangladesh. And now Protestants fight Catholics in Ireland, Muslims fight Jews in the Middle East, and Christians and Muslims kill one another in Sudan, Kosovo, and Jakarta. We filter our information about our own and other cultures to suit our images of ourselves. Thus, as most Americans are Christian, at least in our ethnic background, we tend to paint for ourselves a somewhat self-serving, modernized, enlightened portrait of the Judeo-Christian tradition. Americans often think of Christianity in terms of its "love thy neighbor" and "turn the other cheek" philosophies. By contrast, when we think of Muslims, we often think of the term "jihad," the holy war that, we assume, feeds the flames of terrorism and civil war. Since the Crusades, the bloody battles between European Christians and Muslim Turks, we have seen Islam as a formidable and barbaric opponent. However, as Joseph Campbell so conclusively points out in Myths to Live By, the aggressiveness that characterizes modern Islam has its roots in the warrior mythologies of the Aryans and Semites, as well as those of ancient Greece--the same mythologies that are shared by Christianity and Judaism. Note: Have most of us forgotten that the root of Christianity is Judaism?[5]
While critics of religion and deity can make a case that religion is a cause of most wars throughout history, an equally legitimate case can be made against the atheistic ideology -- which is arguably a religion -- as being the cause of one of the major wars in the world. In his book Thru the Bible with J. Vernon McGee, the late Bible scholar attributed the following quote to Adolf Hitler, "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." Although historians note that the quote should be properly attributed to Hitler's propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, there seems to be no dispute that the quote is rightly attributed to the former Hitler regime. Hitler, in his maniacal quest for power and perceived racial purity, set out to systematically eliminate the German Jewish population in what is known as the Jewish Holocaust. What is not commonly known, and I choose to make note of it here, is that he also attempted to eliminate the Black Germans -- most of whom came from Rhineland -- in the same manner, in the same camps, although history ignores their mistreatment dating back to the late 1800s. [Read more in Destined to Witness: Growing Up Black in Nazi Germany, by Hans J. Massaquoi]
REALISM, rather than romanticism, is an essential element in Christian judgment. Nowhere is this as verifiable than in
The Protestant community in